Independent. MyID is not affiliated with the Department of Social Protection, MyGovID, or the Government of Ireland.

Digital-identity accessibility and inclusion

Published 2026-08-22Updated 2026-08-22By MyID Editorial

A verification method is not effective if legitimate people cannot use it. Accessibility and fallback must be designed into the assurance model rather than added as an untested exception after launch.

Ireland status · verified 22 August 2026

The EUDI framework protects voluntary wallet use and appropriate alternatives. EDPB age guidance also highlights accessibility and alternative methods where groups risk discrimination.

For: service owners, accessibility, product, privacy, operations and procurement teams. This is independent information, not legal, compliance or security advice.

Common barriers

Design requirements

Fallback needs assurance

An alternative must manage risk without becoming either an insecure bypass or a punitive dead end. Define evidence, trained staff, privacy, escalation and decision records for the fallback itself.

Measure inclusion

Track acquisition failures, repeated attempts, abandonment, fallback, queue time, complaints and reversals. Combine quantitative results with disabled-user research, while minimising sensitive-data collection.

Evidence and limits

MyID separates enacted rules, official implementation material, testing and vendor claims. A source can establish what its publisher says; it does not prove that every product, deployment or interpretation works as claimed. Where Irish implementation remains unsettled, this page says so.

Sources checked 22 August 2026. Re-check the linked primary material before making a consequential decision.

Next useful pages

Follow the Irish evidence

Get the business briefing when Irish wallet, verification and age-assurance evidence changes.

Join the business briefing